Prediction of Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger vs Chayenne Ewijk Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
M. Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger vs C. Ewijk

Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger

GEO

0

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

134

Best Rank

229

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$30.0K

Career Money

Plays

Chayenne Ewijk

NED

0

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

134

Best Rank

229

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$30.0K

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger 0 - 1 Ewijk

They have played 3 sets in total, with Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger winning 1 and Chayenne Ewijk winning 2. The last match between Chayenne Ewijk and Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger was at the Alphen aan den Rijn, 03-09-2012, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Draw getting the victory 7-6(5) 3-6 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger	0
Ewijk	1

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) Alphen aan den Rijn(09-03-12)

Stats

Chayenne Ewijk

Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger

M. Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger vs C. Ewijk H2H Profile

M. Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger	Stats	C. Ewijk
$29,995	Career Prize Money	$0
53.24% (304-267)	Career Total W/L	64.21% (183-102)
0	Clay	1
10	Titles	7
0	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

M. Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger vs C. Ewijk Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Chayenne Ewijk has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Chayenne Ewijk has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chayenne Ewijk has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Chayenne Ewijk winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 216/155), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/5). Chayenne Ewijk has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 110/58), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 14/9).
Player level: In the last year, Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Chayenne Ewijk has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger winning 0 times and Chayenne Ewijk being victorious 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger winning 1 and Chayenne Ewijk winning 2.
The last match between Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger and Chayenne Ewijk was at the Alphen aan den Rijn, 03-09-2012, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Draw getting the victory 7-6(5) 3-6 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:29:59.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Chayenne Ewijk has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chayenne Ewijk has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chayenne Ewijk has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger vs Chayenne Ewijk Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger vs C. Ewijk H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

M. Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger	Stats	C. Ewijk
0	H2H Matches Won	1
1	Sets Won	2
16	Games Won	16
3	Aces (Total)	4
2	Total Double Faults	8
2:29:59	Average Match Time	2:29:59
65% (72/110)	1st Serve %	62% (72/116)
60% (43/72)	1st Serve Win %	61% (44/72)
34% (13/38)	2nd Serve Win %	36% (16/44)
50% (8/16)	Break Pts Won %	57% (8/14)
48% (56/116)	Return Points Win %	49% (54/110)
0% (0/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	100% (1/1)
0% (0/1)	Deciding Set Win %	100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

M. Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Antalya - 12-12-2016
R1 Ulrikke EikeriU. Eikeri	L	6-4 6-0	Stats
Q3 Esen KokceE. Kokce	W	2-6 6-0 6-2	Stats
Telavi - 14-09-2015
R1 Anna PribylovaA. Pribylova	W	4-6 6-3 6-3	Stats
R2 Polina NovikovaP. Novikova	L	7-6(10) 6-4	Stats
Beinasco - 23-02-2015
R1 Gioia BarbieriG. Barbieri	L	7-5 6-3	Stats

View All

C. Ewijk Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Petange - 30-10-2017
F Sviatlana PirazhenkaS. Pirazhenka	L	6-2 4-6 6-0	Stats
SF Eleonora MolinaroE. Molinaro	W	6-3 6-2	Stats
QF Xenia KnollX. Knoll	W	6-4 2-1 ret.	Stats
R2 Deborah KerfsD. Kerfs	W	7-5 6-7(6) 6-1	Stats
R1 Cindy CastilleC. Castille	W	6-2 4-6 7-5	Stats

View All

M. Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger vs C. Ewijk Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

M. Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger	Stats	C. Ewijk
53.52% (304/264)	YTD Win/Loss	64.21% (183/102)
52.17% (686/629)	Sets Win/Loss	62.31% (405/245)
50.84% (6109/5908)	Games Win/Loss	55.90% (3282/2589)
48.96% (47/49)	Hard Win/Loss	64.71% (55/30)
58.22% (216/155)	Clay Win/Loss	65.48% (110/58)
42.71% (41/55)	Indoor Hard W/L	56.25% (18/14)
0.00% (0/5)	Grass Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
0.01	Aces Per Game	0.1
67	Aces Total	280
0.04	Double Faults Per Game	0.15
213	Total Double Faults	427
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
587.33	Average Opponent Rank	558.61
62% (2372/3855)	1st Serve %	59% (2929/4972)
55% (1304/2372)	1st Serve Win %	66% (1936/2929)
41% (615/1483)	2nd Serve Win %	43% (875/2043)
47% (193/413)	Break Points Won % (Total)	50% (369/733)
43% (1609/3719)	Return Points Win %	49% (2519/5151)
18.18% (4/18)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
25.00% (1/3)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
0.00% (0/3)	Cups W/L	50.00% (2/2)
38.78% (19/30)	Main Tour W/L	50.00% (2/2)
54.78% (235/194)	Challenger W/L	53.16% (42/37)
73.77% (45/16)	Futures W/L	69.19% (137/61)
53% (299/559)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	65% (182/278)
25% (1/4)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/2)
48% (60/124)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	58% (33/57)
55% (99/179)	Deciding Set Win %	55% (46/84)
87% (282/244)	1st Set Won, Won Match	88% (181/160)
13% (282/38)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	10% (181/19)
21% (286/59)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	22% (104/23)